Ready for Adoption?
Adoption Network Law Center
Adoption Network Law Center
Want to Adopt? Click here.
Click here to be helped in California!
Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click here.
Adoption Network Law Center
Transracial/Transcultural Adoption Blog

10/17/07

"Real" Orphans

Posted by : Erin H in Transracial/Transcultural Adoption Blog at 11:13 am , 378 words, 130 views  
Categories: Ethical Issues
Mary over at the Ethiopia Adoption blog as a great post today about "true orphans", and about the conflict some people feel adopting children who still have living parents. I was going to leave a comment, but decided I have enough to say to warrant a post or two of my own. :)

In this post I am going to discuss who I feel qualifies as a true orphan. Is a child who has been orphaned by the death of his parents "more" of an orphan than a child who has been relinquished by parents who cannot care for him because of poverty of illness?

Honestly, I do not believe that one child in an orphanage or foster care can be "needier" than another based on their family history. An orphaned child is an orphaned child.

We have adopted children who had both of their parents die. We have adopted children who were abandoned by single mothers. We have adopted children who had both parents alive (in the U.S.) but those parents had chosen to place the children for adoption. In all of those cases, the children were in need of a new family, because for one reason or another, their first families were no longer parenting them. In all of those cases, without adoption, those children would have grown up without a family.

SPONSOR

I do not think that my children who were orphaned by the death of their parents were any more deserving of an adoptive family than the children whose parents chose to place them for adoption. They were all true orphans.

However, where things get sticky, is that to me, there is a difference between children being relinquished for adoption in the United States and children being relinquished for adoption in countries struggling with poverty, illness and lack of resources.

Now I am not saying that children who are relinquished for international adoption in poorer countries are not deserving of being adopted or that all of those adoption are unethical, but it is definitely more complicated and there is a lot more "gray area" in between right and wrong.

In my next post I will write about some of the issues involved with parents relinquishing children for adoption in countries suffering from poverty and illness.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Susan [Member] Email · www.readingwritingliving.wordpress.com
Hmmm.. interesting. I think "true" orphans are those whose parents have died, period. I think children whose parents put them in an orphanage are relinquished, or even abandoned, but I would NOT call them orphans. But I don't think any of these are more deserving of adoption than any others.
PermalinkPermalink 10/17/07 @ 18:20
Comment from: Erin H [Member] Email · http://transracial.adoptionblogs.com/
I looked up the definition of orphan:

a. A child whose parents are dead.
b. A child who has been deprived of parental care and has not been adopted.
2. A young animal without a mother.
3. One that lacks support, supervision, or care

So to me, a child who has been truly relinquished or abandoned is an orphan (by these definitions), but it is true that many mean "a child whose parents have both died" when they say a "true orphan".

I just think it gets sticky when you start labeling some kids are "true orphans" and others as not... is a child whose mother has died and father is "unknown" or "gone" a true orphan? Is a child whose parents have had their parental rights terminated a true orphan? Is a child whose parents are dieing a true orphan?

I guess I just don't like the phrase, because it implies that some kids are more needy than others, or more deserving than others (but again, I do know that most people use the phrase "true orphan" to mean a child who has had his parents die).
PermalinkPermalink 10/17/07 @ 18:54
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
"true orphan" is actually a legal definition, each country has to define what that means. The definition you have stated above is a good start. The term does not necessarily mean children who have two dead parents by any means.

To our family, it is a starting point for identifying children who "truly" need to be adopted, as opposed to families who need some interim assistance so they can thrive.

good discussion Mary, Erin and Sandra!
PermalinkPermalink 10/18/07 @ 08:21
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Transracial/Transcultural Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 140